American Scientist

To the Editors: 

I love American Scientist and read most issues cover to cover. The consistent emphasis on connecting disciplines and highlighting complexity are key strengths.

What has compelled me to write, however, is that in articles that so clearly recognize complexity, authors often discuss “solutions” to complex problems. A “solution” implies certainty and a sense of finality. When these “solutions” prove temporary or raise new problems, those who don’t appreciate complexity have cause to doubt the scientists who offered the perceived “solutions.” Further, the idea of “solving” is counter to being adaptable. Pressing social issues ranging from procuring energy and water to addressing poverty will never be “solved,” and using that language offsets the power found in recognizing their complexity. 

Kristan Cockerill
Boone, NC