Occasional Design
By Henry Petroski
An everyday challenge provides lessons in the processes of planning and execution
An everyday challenge provides lessons in the processes of planning and execution
DOI: 10.1511/2010.82.16
The problem of moving and removing large rocks and boulders is millennia old. In its more sophisticated form, the problem has been one of moving large pieces of stone to assemble pyramids, erect obelisks and build cathedrals. In most of these cases, there was little but the power of men, animals and ingenuity to assist in the task. What machines were eventually devised were themselves typically human or animal powered. Most heavy lifting was likely done by direct muscle power involving as large a number of men as necessary, in which case the design of a procedure to determine who lifted when and who pushed and pulled when was critical to the success of the project. Building great monuments, in which there was an enormous amount of repetitive moving of similar pieces of stone, no doubt entailed set operations—and improvements on them as the project progressed. These procedures had to be designed, however, and they most likely evolved by trial and error from ad hoc solutions devised, watched and executed by master builders, engineers and the workers themselves.
Tom Dunne
Click "American Scientist" to access home page
American Scientist Comments and Discussion
To discuss our articles or comment on them, please share them and tag American Scientist on social media platforms. Here are links to our profiles on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn.
If we re-share your post, we will moderate comments/discussion following our comments policy.