Current Issue

This Article From Issue

November-December 2012

Volume 100, Number 6
Page 436

DOI: 10.1511/2012.99.436

To the Editors:

I have just seen Daniel Silver’s article in the September–October issue of American Scientist (“Slicing a Cone for Art and Science”) and thought you might be interested in this recent use of a tilted truncated cone at the Royal Observatory Greenwich (shown below). The cone is illustrated halfway down the page at http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/~catchpol/.

Photograph courtesy of Robert Catchpole.

I was asked to think of a design for enclosing our new planetarium. I gave my idea to our architects and was rather amused to see that their first plan showed an egg shape. Having read your article, I see they had a fine precedent in Durer.

I had a lot of fun showing how my design changed with latitude, from a dull cylinder at the pole to something like a strange elongated upturned boat near the equator.

Robin Catchpole
Institute of Astronomy
Cambridge University

American Scientist Comments and Discussion

To discuss our articles or comment on them, please share them and tag American Scientist on social media platforms. Here are links to our profiles on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn.

If we re-share your post, we will moderate comments/discussion following our comments policy.