The Call of Science

The scientific vocation is rooted in non-authoritarian, evidence-based discovery.

Communications Ethics

Current Issue

This Article From Issue

March-April 2024

Volume 112, Number 2
Page 92

DOI: 10.1511/2024.112.2.92

It is a curious thing to be called to a life of science. To the uninitiated, the disciplined practices of researchers may seem mysterious and even odd, like those of an unfamiliar, cloistered, religious sect. Much lab work is done silently; picture hushed chemists at the bench. Field observations are often done in solitude; think of Jane Goodall watching chimps in the Gombe. The deliberate motions of data collection may appear ritualistic; consider limnologists drawing daily water samples from a vernal pond. A detached observer might watch these researchers for weeks and get no more than a superficial sense of what they are doing, let alone an appreciation of why. What compels their strange devotion? What does it mean to feel the call of science?

QUICK TAKE
  • Humans by nature are curious, and when we feel called to the vocation of science, it is rooted in this biological impulse to explore the contours of the world.
  • To capture a true picture of the world, science became a disciplined practice driven by observation and empirical evidence, instead of by reference to an authority.
  • Scientific values determine the collective ethos of science, and include character virtues such as skepticism, honesty, objectivity, persistence, and humility to evidence.
To access the full article, please log in or subscribe.
The scientific vocation is rooted in non-authoritarian, evidence-based discovery.

American Scientist Comments and Discussion

To discuss our articles or comment on them, please share them and tag American Scientist on social media platforms. Here are links to our profiles on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn.

If we re-share your post, we will moderate comments/discussion following our comments policy.